Friday, January 14, 2011

CSzem's Corner: The Divisional Round

(BOD - Bar Refaeli)

After a perfectly average showing in Wild Card Weekend of the NFL Playoffs (2-2), I’m back for more. The dream of an 11-0 run in the playoffs is dead. Actually it was dead about an hour into the first game when it was clear that all of the factors I highlighted about the Saints/Seahawks game – short week, tough stadium, Super Bowl Hangover – were going to be too much to overcome, and the Saints had no shot to cover the double-digit spread.

But hey, 2-2 isn’t terrible. Right there in the meaty part of the curve, not showing off, not falling behind.

Interestingly enough, I was KIND OF on the right track with how I was evaluating the games. As I mentioned, in the past, I used to just take all 4 home teams in Round 1 and know that I would go 3-1. Yes, I was (likely) killing my chances of winning all 4, but the downside of “trying to find the upset” happens when you’re wrong. All of a sudden, you go 2-2, because not only does your upset pick not happen, but you also lose the upset that actually DOES happen.

Which brings us back to last week. I liked all four road teams, I really did. But in my mind, there was no way that all four road teams would win and/or cover. So I assessed all the games and took a shot at which one I’d go “the other way” on. I landed on Philly because of how explosive they can be, and the fact that if Vick went off, I’d have felt stupid betting against him.

Well, it turns out, I was right on a couple counts: the road teams were great plays, but 4-0 was unattainable. One of them had to lose. So I took my shot at guessing which one it would be, and I guessed wrong, so I went 2-2. If I had gone with all 4, I would have gone 3-1 like I said was the goal.

On to this week’s picks (which will, of course, not incorporate any lessons I may have learned that would help me make better picks).

The Game: Baltimore @ Pittsburgh

The Line: Pittsburgh (-3.5)

This is the easiest game for me to pick this week, which sounds ridiculous since it might be the most evenly matched rivalry in the entire league. But that’s just it. These teams are separated by absolutely nothing as far as I can tell.

There are a bunch of stats out there to support just how close this rivalry actually is. Since the start of the 2003 season, these teams have played each other 15 times. The Steelers have won 8 times, the Ravens have won 7. Both teams have scored EXACTLY 275 points. 7 of those games have been decided by 3 points or less. That’s enough stats. Give me the points.

The Pick: Baltimore (+3.5)

The Game: Green Bay @ Atlanta

The Line: Atlanta (-2.5)

I am pretty much out of stats for the rest of these picks. Kind of blew my wad a tad early on that first one (now I’ve got this big mess on my hands….). This pick is more about “feel”, and it’s a tough one. As I said last week, I think these are two of the best three teams in the NFC (and they’re the only ones of that group left), so this is a major toss-up.

One thing that keeps getting beaten over everyone’s head is Matt Ryan’s incredible record at home. He is now 20-2 in the Georgia Dome for his career, which is obviously remarkable. One of those wins came in late November against this very same Packers team. That game was a very tightly contested contest that came down to the wire.

The problem with the Falcons is that they don’t pass “the eye test”. They’re boring. There are no great storylines here, or mega-stars (Ryan is their biggest star, but their best player is Roddy White a WR who somehow toils in relative anonymity, despite being arguably the best WR in football). There’s no Aaron Rodgers, or Clay Matthews, or Charles Woodson, to get people excited. The Packers look like a team that might be on a mission to the Super Bowl. All season, it’s seemed like they have the most talent in the NFC and are simply waiting to take control.

So one of two things is going to happen in this game:

1) They finally take control and assume the role as NFC favourite (even though they’d be going on the road for the NFC Championship game)

2) They’ll lose the game, fail to get “over the hump”, and everyone will wonder why

Despite injuries and coaching, I’m going with #1.

The Pick: Green Bay (+2.5)

The Game: Seattle @ Chicago

The Line: Chicago (-10)

Everyone has spent the entire week convincing themselves that the Seahawks now have a bit of a “swagger”, and “nothing to lose”, and are finally healthy, and look like a team that can do some damage. Everyone is also pointing out the fact that this game happened once earlier in the year, and (amazingly enough) Seattle actually went into Soldier Field and won.

What everyone is failing to remember is that they lost 9 FREAKING GAMES! Do you realize that the only way they can finish OVER .500 is by winning the Super Bowl (they’d finish 11-9)..? Even losing in the Super Bowl would leave them at 10-10, which is absurd. This is a team that went 2-6 on the road in the regular season. Yes, one of those two wins came against the Bears (the other came against an abominable Arizona team that would have been better off with Tewks as its starting QB), but who cares. They are awful, and we all seem to have collectively forgotten as we pick our jaws up from off the ground after watching Marshawn Lynch’s insane run from last week.

I actually think it’s going to be a positive thing that Chicago lost that game earlier in the year. They are really the only team in the league that has any feeling of needing “revenge” against Seattle (a few of the players have already made reference to the fact that they were hoping for a rematch), and there’s absolutely no way that Seattle is coming into Soldier Field and winning twice this year.

I’m aware that they could lose, and still cover, but as discussed last week, when they lose, they lose big.

The Pick: Chicago (-10)

The Game: NY Jets @ New England

The Line: New England (-9.5)

This line is insanely high for a playoff game matching up two very good teams, and division rivals. There is genuine dislike between these two. Jets CB Antonio Cromartie called Tom Brady an “asshole” this week, and Rex Ryan has spent a tonne of time talking about how much better Peyton Manning is than Brady.

Neither of those things seem like particularly good ideas from the Jets, when they’re matching up against a team that:

a) Beat them 45-3 on December 6th
b) Is on an 8 game winning streak (5 of which came against teams that qualified for the playoffs, so they’re not beating patsies)
c) Has scored an average of 37.4 points during said streak, never failing to score at least 31
d) Has won those 8 games by an AVERAGE of 21.8 points

I don’t need to waste any more time. I don’t care how “tough” the Pats opponent is, you cannot bet against them right now. They could be matched up with the ’85 Bears and I think they’d score 30+. Weather doesn’t bother them, defenses don’t bother them.

This pick could blow up, the line is too high for a divisional, hard-nosed, playoff matchup, but I’ll be damned if I’m betting against Tom Brady right now.

The Pick: New England (-9.5)

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Talkin' with Tewks Live: Hall of Fame Voting and Biggest Loser

(BOD - Rihanna)

Gretzpo and I discuss the following:

- Roberto Alomar
- Bert Blyleven
- Jack Morris
- Blue Jays lore
- The voting process
- Jesse Litsch's workout regime
- Athlete training
- The mystery trainers on The Biggest Loser
- The chick with the most upside

Talkin' with Tewks Live - Hall of Fame Voting and Biggest Loser

Enjoy.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Alomar: Greatest Jay or Just First Jay?

(BOD - Put me in the middle for a Tewks sandwich)

I will be posting my weekly column today and the podcast will be moved to Thursday morning this week as Gretzpo was out late last night pursuing sins of the flesh and he didn’t have time to record a podcast.


I would never be one to stand in front of man at the precipice of such sensual delights; if I was, what kind of wingman would I be? Although, I do like how this problem never arose with a boring, married guy like CSzem.

Nevertheless, I figure it’s time that I weigh on the recent Baseball Hall of Fame voting results which saw Roberto Alomar inducted into the Hall on his second year on the ballot. He received over 90 percent of the votes and Alomar deserves every single one as he is enshrined in Cooperstown as one of the most dynamic second basemen to ever play the game.

More importantly for Toronto Blue Jays fans, Alomar will go into the Hall in July with a Jays cap on his head. He will be the first player ever inducted wearing a Toronto hat, which means that the Hall of Fame feels that the one team that best embodies Alomar’s professional career is the Blue Jays.

It’s a tremendous accolade and a long time coming for the franchise. The decision has also catalyzed spirited debate in the GTA about whether or not Alomar is the greatest Jay in team history.

The short answer: No.

Look, I’m a fan of Roberto Alomar as much as the next guy and I’m happy that he’s the newest member of the Hall of Fame. And I have no problem saying he was one of the greatest players in Blue Jays history. However, he is not number one. Truthfully, I think he’d barely be able to sneak into the top five.

I know the majority of Jays fans will read this and automatically dismiss my argument and accuse me of heresy for daring to question the greatness of Roberto, but hear me out. Just because he’s going into the Hall as a Jay doesn’t mean that he is suddenly the face of the franchise and all other players in team history pale mildly in comparison.

I have no problem saying that Roberto Alomar is the most talented and probably best position player who ever suited up for the Jays. However, he is not the best BLUE JAY of all time. There’s a difference.

Alomar only played her for five seasons. It’s insulting to the other great players in the history of the franchise to give the greatest Jay ever tag to someone who was only here for half a decade. But he was incredible for those five seasons, critics will argue. Alomar’s body of work in those five seasons supersede the fact he was for only five years.

By that logic, that means Roger Clemens (two years, two Cy Youngs, 500 strikeouts, 40 wins) was the greatest pitcher in Blue Jays history. And I don’t think there’s a Jays fan on Earth who wants to make that claim.

Alomar was great, but he didn’t spend his formative years here and his time in Toronto was much too short. To me, the greatest Blue Jay mantle is between four players: Dave Stieb, Roy Halladay, George Bell and Carlos Delgado.

To pick the greatest Jay, you need to look at longevity and what that person meant to his teams, plus gaudy statistics. Delgado and Halladay will probably get more votes because everyone has forgotten the eighties already and we’re in a ‘what have you done for me lately’ culture.

I think Halladay and Stieb are equals, Bell is just above those guys, but Delgado is in a class by himself. I know he left on questionable terms with the fan base, but once all is said and done, he will be looked upon as the best Jay of all time (and I don’t think he belongs in the Hall of Fame).